Please Enable JavaScript in your Browser to Visit this Site.

top of page
TOK Advice

Theory Of Knowledge Checklist

Solving Questions

1. Understanding the Prescribed Title (PT)

  • Did you fully understand the PT?

    • Have you broken down key terms in the PT?

    • Have you identified hidden assumptions in the PT?

    • Have you formulated Knowledge Questions (KQs) related to the PT?

  • Does your essay respond directly to the PT?

    • Every argument must connect to the PT.

    • Avoid reinterpreting the question—stick to what it actually asks.

  • Have you chosen the best Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) for analysis?

    • Do your AOKs provide contrasting perspectives?

    • Are your AOKs relevant to the PT?

    • Do your AOKs allow for strong real-world examples?

 

2. Introduction (Approximately 150-200 words)

  • Did you engage the reader?

    • Does your introduction start with a thought-provoking idea, real-world example, or question?

  • Did you define key terms from the PT?

    • Have you provided contextual definitions instead of generic dictionary definitions?

  • Is your thesis clear?

    • Have you clearly stated your stance or line of argument?

    • Does your thesis address the PT directly?

  • Did you outline your structure?

    • Have you briefly introduced your AOKs and how they will support your argument?

 

3. Body Paragraphs (Approximately 1200 words total)

Each AOK should be covered in two paragraphs:

  • Paragraph 1: Claim (How this AOK supports a specific perspective on the PT)

  • Paragraph 2: Counterclaim (A contrasting perspective within the same AOK)

AOK 1 Analysis

  • Claim Paragraph (Approximately 300 words)

    • Have you made a clear claim related to the PT?

    • Have you used a specific real-world example?

    • Have you explained why this example is relevant?

    • Have you included TOK concepts such as ways of knowing, justification, and certainty?

  • Counterclaim Paragraph (Approximately 300 words)

    • Have you provided a contrasting viewpoint to challenge your claim?

    • Have you supported the counterclaim with a real-world example?

    • Have you explained the implications of this challenge?

AOK 2 Analysis

  • Claim Paragraph (Approximately 300 words)

    • Does this AOK provide a different perspective on the PT?

    • Have you included real-world evidence?

    • Have you clearly linked it to TOK themes such as the reliability of knowledge, bias, and ethics?

  • Counterclaim Paragraph (Approximately 300 words)

    • Have you critically examined a weakness or alternative perspective?

    • Have you presented a balanced argument rather than just one-sided reasoning?

 

4. Conclusion (Approximately 250 words)

  • Have you summarized your main insights?

    • Does your conclusion clearly restate your findings without repeating word-for-word?

  • Did you answer the PT?

    • Have you given a final verdict on whether the claim or counterclaim is stronger?

  • Have you considered limitations?

    • Have you acknowledged any weaknesses in your argument?

    • Have you suggested how other perspectives might challenge your conclusion?

  • Did you leave the reader with a thought-provoking idea?

    • Have you included a final reflection or open-ended question?

 

5. Use of TOK Concepts and Vocabulary

  • Are you using TOK terminology effectively?

    • Have you naturally included key TOK terms such as ways of knowing, knowledge questions, justification, bias, and certainty?

  • Did you avoid overusing jargon?

    • Have you ensured that every TOK term is clearly explained rather than just name-dropped?

  • Have you addressed different perspectives?

    • Have you considered alternative viewpoints within each AOK?

  • Did you analyze rather than just describe?

    • Have you explained how knowledge is constructed rather than just stating facts?

 

6. Quality of Real-World Examples

  • Are your examples specific and relevant?

    • Have you used real-world examples from credible sources such as history, science, personal experiences, and current events?

    • Have you avoided hypothetical or vague examples?

  • Have you analyzed each example?

    • Have you explained why your example supports your argument?

    • Have you considered any counterexamples or limitations?

  • Are your examples diverse?

    • Have you used examples from different disciplines, cultures, or perspectives?

 

7. Writing Style and Organization

  • Is your essay well-structured?

    • Does your argument flow logically from introduction to claims, counterclaims, and conclusion?

    • Are your paragraphs clearly structured with topic sentences and transitions?

  • Is your writing clear and concise?

    • Have you eliminated wordiness and repetition?

    • Are your sentences grammatically correct?

    • Have you avoided informal language?

  • Have you used proper citations (if required)?

    • Have you credited all sources using a consistent citation style such as MLA or APA?

 

8. Final Editing Checklist

  • Have you checked for grammar and spelling mistakes?

  • Have you met the word count (1200-1600 words)?

  • Have you asked your TOK teacher to review your essay?

  • Have you ensured every paragraph is directly relevant to the PT?

bottom of page