English

Example Model Answer​

How do the endings of literary works reflect the authors' perspectives on power and tyranny?

​

Literary works may end as a triumph or a tragedy, but regardless of the outcome, writers often craft multi-perspectival narratives with elements that resonate with a broad spectrum of readers. Whether comforting or unsettling, these works present overarching messages, either explicit or implicit, that leave a lasting impact. This notion is vividly illustrated in George Orwell's 1984 and William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Macbeth. 1984 is a dystopian novel that explores the oppressive nature of an oligarchic collectivist society through the perspective of Winston Smith, an outer party member who dares to rebel against the totalitarian regime. Conversely, Macbeth follows the tragic trajectory of a war hero who, driven by unchecked ambition, commits regicide and ultimately meets his downfall. Both works, despite their differing endings, offer profound commentaries on the nature of power and tyranny. While 1984 culminates in the triumph of a despotic regime, Macbeth concludes with the tyrant's defeat, yet both narratives serve as cautionary tales that warn against the dangers of tyrannical rule. Through their distinct conclusions, these works hyperbolize the battle between hope and evil, ultimately appealing to the beliefs and values of their audiences and discouraging the emergence of future tyrannies.

​

In 1984, Orwell presents a society dominated by a tyrannical regime, where freedom and individuality are ruthlessly suppressed. Despite the bleak setting, Orwell manages to provide a form of comfort to readers by emphasizing the importance of resistance and hope. The novel's protagonist, Winston Smith, engages in a series of rebellious acts against the Party's authoritarian control, driven by his belief in the fundamental right to freedom of thought. He famously declares, "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." This quote encapsulates the essence of intellectual freedom and underscores the significance of maintaining one's autonomy in the face of oppression. Orwell further reinforces the Party's malevolent nature through Winston's observation that "The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power." The repetition of the word "power" draws the reader's attention to the Party's unrelenting pursuit of dominance, highlighting the dangers inherent in absolute authority.

​

Orwell's portrayal of the Party as a force driven solely by the desire for power serves as a stark reminder of the potential for corruption in any political system. The reader, regardless of their own views, is compelled to consider the implications of such unchecked power. For many, particularly those who value freedom and democracy, this depiction of tyranny is deeply unsettling. Yet, Orwell offers a glimmer of hope through the resilience of the human spirit. Winston reflects on the Party's inability to alter one's inner emotions: "They could not alter your feelings: for that matter you could not alter them yourself, even if you wanted to." This quote suggests that despite the Party's extensive control over external actions and thoughts, the intrinsic nature of human emotion remains beyond their reach. Orwell thereby reassures readers that even in the darkest of times, the core of human individuality and resistance can endure.

​

However, the ultimate conclusion of 1984 is not one of victory for the protagonist but rather a devastating defeat. Winston is eventually captured by the Thought Police, subjected to intense torture, and indoctrinated into blind loyalty to the Party. The novel ends with Winston's complete submission, as he professes his love for Big Brother. This conclusion is a powerful statement on the overwhelming might of totalitarian regimes, and it leaves the reader with a sense of despair. Yet, even in this tragic ending, Orwell's narrative encourages reflection on the importance of resistance, no matter how futile it may seem. The reader is left to ponder the implications of living in a society where truth is malleable and where power is the ultimate end. Orwell's message is clear: the struggle for freedom and truth is a noble one, even if it ends in apparent failure.

​

In contrast to the bleak and dystopian world of 1984, Shakespeare's Macbeth offers a narrative in which tyranny is ultimately overthrown, providing a more traditional sense of moral resolution. The play follows the rise and fall of Macbeth, a once-honorable warrior who succumbs to his ambition and becomes a tyrant. Shakespeare uses various literary techniques to convey the moral consequences of Macbeth's actions and to offer comfort to the audience through the eventual triumph of justice.

One of the key techniques Shakespeare employs is the use of foils. Banquo, Macbeth's foil, is portrayed as a figure of integrity and loyalty, representing what Macbeth could have been had he remained true to his principles. Banquo's ghost, which haunts Macbeth, serves as a constant reminder of the moral decay that has consumed the protagonist. This spectral presence not only highlights the tragedy of Macbeth's fall but also reinforces the importance of maintaining one's honor and integrity. The use of foils in Macbeth serves to emphasize the moral consequences of Macbeth's actions, providing the audience with a clear contrast between good and evil.

​

Moreover, Shakespeare's use of soliloquies allows the audience to gain insight into Macbeth's inner turmoil as he grapples with his conscience. One of the most famous soliloquies in the play, "Is this a dagger which I see before me," captures Macbeth's moral conflict as he contemplates the murder of King Duncan. This soliloquy reveals the depth of Macbeth's internal struggle, as he is torn between his ambition and his awareness of the moral implications of his actions. The soliloquy also serves to humanize Macbeth, making his descent into tyranny all the more tragic. By showcasing Macbeth's inner conflict, Shakespeare provides the audience with a sense of the psychological toll of his actions, ultimately leading to his downfall. The theme of justice and redemption is further reinforced through the character of Macduff, who emerges as the play's moral avenger. Macduff's quest for justice represents the potential for redemption and the triumph of good over evil. His confrontation with Macbeth and eventual victory symbolizes the restoration of moral order. Macduff's victory is not merely a personal triumph but a broader victory for justice and morality. Through Macduff's actions, Shakespeare reassures the audience that tyranny cannot endure and that those who commit evil deeds will ultimately face the consequences of their actions.

​

In addition to the literary techniques of foils and soliloquies, Shakespeare's use of vivid imagery further enhances the play's moral message. The imagery of blood, particularly in Lady Macbeth's sleepwalking scene, serves as a powerful symbol of guilt and the inescapable consequences of immoral actions. Lady Macbeth's famous line, "Out, damned spot! Out, I say!" as she attempts to wash away the imaginary bloodstains from her hands, underscores the psychological torment that both she and Macbeth experience as a result of their crimes. This haunting imagery serves as a warning against the corrupting influence of power and ambition, and it reinforces the play's moral message.

Shakespeare's portrayal of Macbeth's downfall also serves as a cautionary tale for the audience, highlighting the dangers of unchecked ambition and the consequences of immoral actions. As Macbeth realizes the full extent of his guilt, he laments, "I have no words. My voice is in my sword, thou bloodier villain than terms can give thee out." This quote not only reflects Macbeth's recognition of his own guilt but also serves as a reminder of the destructive nature of ambition when it is not tempered by moral considerations. The play's conclusion, with Macbeth's death and the restoration of order, offers a sense of closure and comfort to the audience, reaffirming the importance of justice and morality.

​

In both 1984 and Macbeth, the authors use their respective endings to explore the theme of power and tyranny, offering different perspectives on the consequences of unchecked authority. Orwell's 1984 presents a world where tyranny prevails, but it also underscores the importance of resistance and the enduring nature of the human spirit. Despite the tragic conclusion, Orwell's narrative invites the reader to reflect on the value of freedom and the dangers of totalitarianism. On the other hand, Shakespeare's Macbeth provides a more conventional resolution, with the tyrant's downfall serving as a reaffirmation of the moral order and the triumph of justice.

Through their distinct approaches, both Orwell and Shakespeare engage the reader in a deeper contemplation of the nature of power and its potential for corruption. Orwell's dystopian vision warns of the perils of totalitarianism and the loss of individual freedom, while Shakespeare's tragic tale highlights the moral consequences of ambition and the inevitability of justice. In both works, the authors use literary techniques such as foils, soliloquies, and imagery to enhance their exploration of these themes, ultimately offering readers a rich and nuanced understanding of the complexities of power and tyranny. In summary, 1984 and Macbeth serve as timeless commentaries on the nature of power, each offering a distinct perspective on the consequences of tyranny. Orwell's portrayal of a dystopian society where individualism is crushed serves as a powerful warning against the dangers of totalitarianism, while Shakespeare's depiction of a tyrant's rise and fall underscores the importance of morality and justice. Through their exploration of these themes, both works continue to resonate with readers, offering comfort, reflection, and a deeper understanding of the human condition in the face of tyranny.